Official website links end with .gov.sg
A Singapore Government Agency Website
Secure websites use HTTPS
Family Justice Courts Case Highlights
Search
Narrow your search
Filter
Filtered by:
Protection for family and vulnerable persons
Clear all
Showing results 1-4 of 4.
Goh Yng Yng Karen (executrix of the estate of Liew Khoon Fong (alias Liew Fong), deceased) v Goh Yong Chiang Kelvin [2020] SGHC 195
The assessment of mental capacity is a holistic one involving functional and clinical components.
Date of Decision: 17 Sep 2020
UNQ v UNR [2020] SGHCF 21
That a personal protection order (“PPO”) may encourage more meaningful access is an irrelevant consideration, and the PPO may on the contrary negatively impact family relationships. The grant of a PPO involves a fact-centric analysis in determining if the threshold under s 65(1) of the Women’s Charter has been satisfied on a balance of probabilities.
Date of Decision: 24 Nov 2020
BUV v BUU and another and another matter [2019] SGHCF 15
The test for capacity in s 4(1) of the Mental Capacity Act 2008 has a functional and clinical component, and the functional component is a judgment for the court to make based on the evidence as to the degree the person’s mental functioning is compromised. The court’s assessment as to mental capacity should be made holistically.
Date of Decision: 20 Jun 2019
TCZ v TDA & Ors [2015] SGFC 63
Undue influence is presumed where there was a relationship of trust and confidence between the parties such that it is fair to presume that the wrongdoer abused the relationship in procuring the other party in the relationship to enter into a transaction.
Date of Decision: 20 May 2015
Share this page:
