A Singapore Government Agency Website

Official website links end with .gov.sg

Government agencies communicate via .gov.sg websites (e.g. go.gov.sg/open).Trusted websites

Secure websites use HTTPS

Look for a lock () or https:// as an added precaution. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Note: To search for hearing details for a specific case, visit the hearing list page.

Going to court for a simplified civil trial (from 1 April 2022)

Note

This page is for matters that the Rules of Court 2021 apply to. For content relating to matters that the Rules of Court 2014 apply, click here.

If you are uncertain as to which version of the Rules of Court applies to your matter, click here.

In this section:

File documents for use in a simplified civil trial (from 1 Apr 2022)
Arriving in court for a simplified civil trial (from 1 Apr 2022)
At your simplified civil trial (from 1 Apr 2022)

At your simplified civil trial (from 1 Apr 2022)

Note

During the trial, parties will be given time and opportunity to present their respective sides of the case. The judge may ask questions to clarify or get additional facts. This is done so that they have all the information needed to decide on the outcome of the case.

You are expected to observe court etiquette at each stage of the court proceedings. You should:

Stand up and bow to show respect when the judge enters the courtroom.
Wait patiently for your turn to speak.
Always stand when you are speaking to the court.
Speak into the microphones provided so that your statements can be recorded clearly.
Avoid interrupting the judge or the lawyer for the other party when they are speaking.
- If you wish to raise a point when it is not your turn to speak, you should wait for the judge or lawyer for the other party to finish speaking first before you seek permission to raise any further points that you wish to state.
Address the judge as "Your Honour", the opposing lawyer as "the learned counsel" and the witness by their surname, for example, Mr Tan or Miss Kamala.
Ask the judge for a short recess if you need to excuse yourself urgently.

Order of proceedings

A simplified civil trial is conducted similar to a full trial with strict time limits imposed at each stage of the proceedings.

These time limits can be extended only with the permission of the judge.

Both parties will take turns to present their case to the judge in the stages as follows:

As each party would have submitted their opening statements to the court prior to the trial, it is up to the judge to decide whether they need to be heard.

If the judge orders that the opening statements be deemed seen and read, parties will not need to make oral opening statements and will go straight into the oral examination of witnesses in court instead.

If the parties are required to make oral opening submissions, the party who made the claim (the claimant) will read their opening statements first, followed by the defendant.

What to expect:

The judge will mark and formally admit the bundles the claimant submitted by naming them with letters and numbers.
- For example, the judge may say "claimant's Bundle of Affidavits marked PA pages 1 to 100".
The judge may also identify witnesses in the same way, such as CW1 for the claimant's witness and DW1 for the defendant's witness.
The claimant will call their witnesses to the witness stand to give evidence in court (also known as the examination-in-chief).
- As the Affidavits of Evidence-in-chief (AEIC) for all witnesses would generally have been exchanged before the trial, the examination-in-chief is usually a very short process unless permission is sought from and granted by the judge to allow for further examination in chief.
The defendant will then have the opportunity to question the claimant’s witnesses (also known as the cross-examination).
The claimant is entitled to re-examine their witnesses after the cross-examination.
The claimant’s case is closed once all the claimant’s witnesses have completed giving evidence.

Note

Time limits

Each party is limited to the following time limits during the examination of the claimant's witnesses.

Step	Time allowed per witness
Examination in chief	10 minutes.
Cross-examination	60 minutes.
Re-examination	10 minutes.

What to expect:

The judge will mark and formally admit the bundles the defendant submitted by naming them with letters and numbers.
- For example, the judge may say "defendant's bundle of affidavits marked DA pages 1 to 100".
The defendant will call their witnesses to the witness stand to give evidence in court (examination-in-chief).
- As the Affidavits of Evidence-in-chief (AEIC) for all witnesses would generally have been exchanged before the trial, the examination-in-chief is usually a very short process unless permission is sought from and granted by the judge to allow for further examination in chief.
The claimant will then have the opportunity to question the defendant’s witnesses (the cross-examination).
The defendant is entitled to re-examine their witnesses after the cross-examination.
The defendant’s case is closed once all the defendant’s witnesses have completed giving evidence.

Note

Time limits

Each party is limited to the following time limits during the examination of the defendant's witnesses.

Step	Time allowed per witness
Examination in chief	10 minutes.
Cross-examination	60 minutes.
Re-examination	10 minutes.

After all the claimant's and defendant's witnesses have given evidence, the court may direct parties to give their closing submissions orally or by way of written submissions.

Alternatively, the court may direct the parties to file written submissions.

Closing submissions refer to the final arguments which a party makes regarding his case. Usually, a party's closing submissions may:

Summarise the evidence heard during the trial.
Set out the reasons why the court should rule in their favour.
- For example, it may contain reasons why the court should not accept the evidence of certain witnesses.
Set out the legal authorities supporting the party's arguments.
- For example, it may contain the relevant legislation or judgment from previously decided cases.

A judgment is the decision of the court at the end of a simplified trial.

Depending on the case, the judge may:

Pronounce judgment immediately after listening to the closing submissions.
Adjourn the case to take more time to consider the evidence and arguments from both parties.
- The court will inform the parties to attend court at a later date for the delivery of judgment.
Give an order for the amount of money (also known as the quantum of damages) to be awarded to the winning party be adjourned to an assessment of damages hearing at a later date.
- This occurs in certain cases (such as personal injury claims) where a judge may pronounce judgment on the issue of liability only and not the precise amount of damages to be paid.

After judgment is given

If a party is unsatisfied with a judgment given by a judge or magistrate, they may file an appeal or leave (permission) to appeal (if necessary).

Refer to Civil appeals against decisions by State Courts judges or magistrates to find out more about the appeal process.

If a party is unsatisfied with a judgment given by a registrar, they may file an appeal.

Refer to Civil appeals against decisions by State Courts registrars to find out more about the appeal process.

Once all proceedings to the case including appeals against orders made pre-trial (interlocutory orders) have concluded, the court may award costs to the parties.

Alternatively, the court may order that costs be assessed. This means that costs are awarded to a party but the amount of the costs is not fixed and is to be determined at an assessment hearing at a later date.

Need help?

The information here is for general guidance as the courts do not provide legal advice. If you need further help, you may want to get independent legal advice.

Find out more